The Christmas season marks the time to give your kids all sorts of gifts, many coming from the ever-evolving video game industry that brings kids and adults much joy. Throughout my childhood, I only recall the grownups around me dismissing video games as nothing more than mental junk food for kids, but that didn’t stop me from asking my parents to get me plenty of games for my Gameboy Advance SP and Nintendo DS. Back then, I had a special interest in Pokémon, which was why I got the Gameboy and DS games in the first place, and today, as an adult with mental health problems like autism and anxiety, my continued special interest helped me reconsider my practices of self-care.
My return to Pokémon games after nearly a decade away from them began in November 2021 when I finally got fed up and bought a Nintendo Switch system with a copy of Pokémon Brilliant Diamond. Since then, I bought three more Pokémon games, and once I grew bored with those, I bought two more critically acclaimed games: Super Mario Odyssey and Stardew Valley. However, playing these two games tainted my view of the Pokémon series a little, as now I recognize how the series’ games aren’t so good at helping rewire the brain to think multiple steps ahead, like what a good video game is supposed to do.
I’m saddened to admit that my current thoughts about the functionality of the four Pokémon games I own are mostly negative, as GameFreak, the company behind these games, is now in a rut of low game quality. Brilliant Diamond and its counterpart Shining Pearl are just copy-and-paste remakes of the Nintendo DS games, Diamond and Pearl, without anything new or innovative to translate how those games would work differently on the Switch compared to the DS. The gameplay thus becomes very grindy with unattractive graphics that lazily attempt to replicate the exact layout of the DS games in 3D.
Pokémon Shield is another one of the Pokémon games I own, which is more concerned about cutting corners to speed up the production process than making something with significant replay value. Pokémon Legends: Arceus is perhaps the best of my Pokémon games, but it still suffers from poor pacing in gameplay that makes the main quest and side quests progress too slowly. Pokémon Scarlet, the last of my games, is graphically lackluster like these other games but has also been notorious among fans for its many glitches- characters passing through objects, objects disappearing, the framerate lagging, and the game even outright crashing. All these games suffer from an imbalance of level scaling in the types of boss fights available, not to mention a constant string of interruptions to offer tutorials in the form of long cutscenes over tasks that didn’t need cutscenes. So yes, getting back into gaming as an adult helped me to see how not to design a video game, but the next games I got outside of Pokémon helped me to finally experience an expertly designed game.
First, Super Mario Odyssey. I did own a Super Mario Bros game on the DS, but this marked my first Mario game on a home counsel. Odyssey involves Mario exploring different kingdoms by possessing some of his enemies with his sentient hat, temporarily borrowing their powers to reach inaccessible areas and collect rewards. Scattered throughout these kingdoms are obstacles that the player must carefully consider the ideal approach to maneuver around, climaxing at boss fights that utilize a certain mechanic- usually one of the critters Mario must possess to take down the intimidating foe. Between these boss fights are many side quests, like running a go-kart race, herding sheep, playing memory games, and even entering a pipe inside the wall, where Mario becomes an 8-bit model based on his Atari-era design. The result is a challenging game for kids and adults that doesn’t hold their hand too much and gives them the freedom to explore.
Second, Stardew Valley. I discovered this masterpiece while searching for what many consider to be the best Switch games, and I was surprised to see a pixel art-style game like this receive such strong unanimous praise. Playing it for myself made me see why. The challenges include developing a farm, growing crops, purchasing animals, fishing, mining for artifacts, fighting monsters, earning money, cooking recipes, and building rapport among the folk in the small town—all easy to learn but difficult to master. Beyond these simple goals are hidden secrets that both encourage and reward further gameplay. Best of all, there’s no rush to get good, the player works at their own pace without time-sensitive pressure toward completion. Hard to believe that just one person developed this entire game!
Ultimately, a good game doesn’t need the most advanced technology by the most well-known studio to be dense and engaging. Games made by passion and knowledge instead of corporate interference offer something more valuable than killing time: Kids and adults overcome challenges that help them realize their true selves. I’ve learned from my time on the Nintendo Switch that I’m not the competitive type, and that fast-paced time-sensitive games like the Mario series aren’t always good for me when I’m stressed enough by life already. A play-at-your-own-pace game like Stardew Valley is a better fit for my personality. Even then, I may want to play Mario at times to stimulate my brain, while on other days when I’m more stressed or depressed, I need a relaxing experience like Stardew Valley. You too can help your son or daughter learn similar traits about themselves by engaging with whatever games or toys they may receive this Christmas season.
-
Trevor Pacelli is a young adult on the autism spectrum as well as the author of What Movies Can Teach Us About Disabilities, What Movies Can Teach Us About Bullying, Summer of the Fruit Virus and the illustrator of The Kindergarten Adventures of Amazing Grace: What in the World is Autism?
​​

--by Trevor Pacelli, author of What Movies Can Teach Us About Disabilities
Autistic people have all sorts of special interests, some are temporary, and others are lifelong. Some even are drawn to a common special interest. Pokémon in particular has quite a bit of appeal to people with autism because the games are run by a simple set of predictable rules that have remained mostly static over many years. It’s a nice blanket of familiarity as someone with autism goes through a long life full of constant change. Every three years, a new generation of Pokémon is always expected to begin, meaning a new set of games debuts with around a hundred brand new Pokémon added to the series. Each game follows a rather similar pattern: you start your adventure after choosing between one of three starter Pokémon, one a grass type, one a fire type, and one a water type, to be your first companion. You explore the region. You battle eight gyms. You take down an evil team. A rival often intrudes your way. Once you win all the badges, you take on the Elite Four and the champion to beat the game.
While playing this game, the type matchups resemble a big complex system of rock-paper-scissors following a logic-based system: grass is strong against water, fire is strong against grass, water is strong against fire, and so on. Because many autistic people love numbers and statistics, and because the adorable Pokémon of this franchise are all so vibrantly colorful, researching the stats and type matchups of these lovable creatures offers a lot of comfort for ASD in a sensory-heavy world.
It all seems fine and dandy… until the latest games, Pokémon Scarlet and Pokémon Violet, introduced a new Pokémon that reminded the fanbase of a problem that has plagued the entire series since day one that has been particularly troublesome for the ASD community. This Pokémon is Finizen, a cute little blue dolphin whose evolution, Palafin, still looks the same besides a pink heart appearing on its chest. While this Pokémon’s stats start off rather mediocre, Palafin contains a special battle gimmick: When sent out into battle and then called back to the trainer’s party, the dolphin ‘mon changes into its “hero” form, with a Superman aesthetic and insane battle stats rivaling most legendary Pokémon, plus a scary attack stat of 160 (the series’ highest attack stat is 190). What makes these Pokémon even more adorable is that Finizen evolves into Palafin at level 38, a nod to the year 1938, when Superman had his first comic book appearance. Unlike most Pokémon who evolve naturally at a certain level, Finizen only evolves when it levels up to at least level 38 while battling in multiplayer, a feature unique to Scarlet and Violet where up to four friends can connect over Wi-Fi and explore the game together.
What could possibly be so bad about this though? Who wouldn’t want a pal like Palafin in Paldea, who evolves while playing with some pals? Well, there are lots of game players, especially those with developmental disabilities, who already struggle to make friends, meaning unless they own a Discord or get lucky enough to encounter a Palafin inside the "tera raid dens" throughout the game, they’ll never get to register Palafin into their Pokédex, and thus will never get to fulfill the series’ slogan of, “gotta catch ‘em all!” This can be true for lots of people who may be socially anxious, not have many friends, or may not have other friends who also play the games, but it’s more especially true for people with developmental disorders, including autism, who already struggle to make friends.
This problem isn’t unique to just Palafin, nor is it unique to Scarlet and Violet, way back at the start of the franchise, right from the Red and Blue days, some Pokémon were made to be only obtainable by hooking up link cables into the Gameboy and trading Pokémon amongst friends. The major releases always have two versions for this specific purpose; Oddish could be caught in Blue version but not Red, and Vulpix could be caught in Red version but not Blue. To add to that toilsome grind, some Pokémon, such as Machoke, Kadabra, and Graveler, could only evolve by trading. Bottom line, nobody could ever complete the Pokédex of any of these games without having friends to trade with. With the whole “gotta catch ‘em all” message that was pressed in the franchise’s early years, it seemed to punish players who didn’t have friends.
This is why the game Pokémon Legends: Arceus was revolutionary for the series… since the players at last no longer needed others to complete the Pokédex. Kadabra, Machoke, and Haunter now evolved simply by being given a new in-game object called a "link cable," and version-exclusive Pokémon were gone; all Pokémon in the Pokédex were available in the same game cartridge. Yet even without the need for this game, the past few generations have made trade-exclusive evolutions, such as Gengar, Machamp, and Dusknoir, available to find in the wild. Thus, it was easier for a player to battle with that one powerful Pokémon on his team as well as fill the dex up. But version-exclusive Pokémon didn’t go away in the major games that came in two versions, especially not in Scarlet and Violet. So in the span of a year, with the existence of Palafin, GameFreak took one step forward and two steps backward.
In future games, the online "trade" component of the games really should be exploited further to make completing the dex easier for people who may struggle to make friends for any number of reasons. I propose that it should be made possible for someone to make a request online for a specific Pokémon they want, and some other player online at some other time could fulfill that request by trading with that person that specific Pokémon they need.  As for Palafin, its evolution method just needs to change. It’s uncertain whether the "multiplayer" feature from Scarlet and Violet will be around in future mainline Pokémon games, so Finizen needs a simpler evolution method, such as by maxing out its happiness with its trainer. If it’s been done before with Feebas’ evolution into Milotic, or Eevee’s evolution into Leafeon, Glaceon, and Sylveon, then surely changing a Pokémon’s method of evolution can be done for Finizen as well.
There are other ways Pokémon isn’t disability-welcoming, starting with its treatment of shiny Pokémon. Each Pokémon has a "shiny" variant with a different color palette, averaging at a 0.01220703125% encounter rate, and many serious players regularly commit dozens of hours to obtain just one shiny of a particular Pokémon. Pokémon Legends: Arceus had a revolutionary new feature in its programming that made shiny hunting infinitely easier; not only do they now appear in the overworld as opposed to exclusively in battle, but a little chime sound effect also goes off with these little stars that glitter around the Pokémon, indicating right away that it’s a shiny.
However, Pokémon Scarlet and Violet left out the stars and sound effect; although the shinies still appeared in the overworld, shiny hunting was still much harder than in Legends: Arceus. Most Pokémon’s shinies can be noticed pretty easily, such as Lechonk’s shiny being bright pink instead of its usual black and brown, but others’ colorations are so minuscule that even one with great eyesight couldn’t tell them apart unless they were paying very close attention, like Paldean Tauros’ shiny being just two slightly different shades of black from its original. It may sound like no big deal, but what if a colorblind player wanted to shiny hunt? They wouldn’t be able to benefit from the sound effect to let them know a shiny was nearby. Or what if somebody had hearing problems? They wouldn’t be able to benefit from the little stars that appear.
On the note of these mainline console games feeling like steps backward from the game before it, many fans have for years complained that it’s time for the games to put in voice acting. They say it’s awkward to watch the lifeless character models move their lips silently while they’re forced to read the text on the screen to know what they’re saying, and with the series now on the Nintendo Switch, they are without excuse to still not have voice acting in their games. Although it’s understandable why the games still lack voices (it’s expensive, and would not fit with when the NPCs talk to the main character… who has a customized name). Although, the games could still benefit from voice actors, which would help blind and dyslexic game players.
One last way Pokémon isn’t entirely accessible for people with disabilities is in Pokémon Go. Wheelchair users have reportedly struggled to access numerous areas the mobile game made them go to, and the act of carrying a phone around while playing proved difficult for players with physical disorders such as motor impairment. Gladly, the COVID-19 pandemic forced the game’s developers to include more stops that also happened to be more accessible for people who maybe couldn’t leave their homes because of physical disabilities.
These types of issues about accessibility in Pokémon, and other video games in general, really need to be made more apparent, because there’s a valuable symbiotic relationship between people with disabilities and this long-lasting series. BBC even did a story on an anxiety-stricken autistic teenager who spent five years refusing to leave his house, and Pokémon Go finally persuaded him to step outside. Stories like this are why I’d like to see more community meetups for people who play the main Pokémon games, and not just for the trading card game or for Pokémon Go. I went to one this past year that was a part of PAX West 2022, and it was an awesome time for me to meet others with the same interest as me, others I could trade and battle with in person. But I want to see something more regular than that happen in my own community, something that can easily help more people like me form friendships over a common interest. I was one of those kids who didn’t naturally value friendships up until high school and only ever invited another kid over to my house to trade Pokémon with about three times, so having something like a regular Pokémon club would have helped me immensely in not only making friends but learning about the value of friendships.
--Trevor's Books | Trevor's Murro Region Pokemon Instagram Page